A.) X-Men Origins: Wolverine
I am kindov an X-Men nerd, but not really. I love the animation and tried to watch every episode (the super old version where Jubilee’s power – firecrackers coming out of her hands – seems awesome, and XMen evolution), but I never really read any of the comic books. Plus, I loved the three big-screen versions previously released.
And I absolutely hate this movie.
The only things worth watching maybe are the opening credit, Hugh Jackman’s hotness, Remy LeBeau’s awesomeness, and Deadpool’s sword-cutting-a-bullet scene.
The movie started in the 1800-ish. The young James (aka Logan, aka Wolverine) killed his father because he didn’t know he was his father. And he did it with some fatal skeleton claws sticking out of his hands.
Freaky much.
That’s what his mother thought (i can only assume it was his mother). She told him ‘what are you?’ with so much disgust and the young James ran away with his brother Victor (aka Sabertooth) and happened to figure in numbers of wars ( let’s see… Civil War, WWI, WWII, Vietnam… hmmm) without aging and became ultra hot.
Ok, I partly blamed SM Sta. Mesa cinema 1 for the bad movie experience. The sound quality of the theater sucked BIG TIME, so I can’t really hear what they’re saying in the movie. And they turned the lights off half-way through the flick. WHAT CINEMA HOUSE WOULD TURN THEIR LIGHTS OFF IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MOVIE?!?
You can’t count too much on the story. It was all about revenge and anger and bad people and personal gain. Look around you – we’re living the story of X-Men Origins.
The movie itself? Well, it sure was funny.
a.) You know that typical shot when a protagonist’s loved one – say, his dah’ling- died on his arms, and the protagonist screamed to the heavens and the camera zoomed up from above his head, and it’s like his ‘NOOOOO!!!!!!!’ echoed around the world?
and you know the fact that that typical shot does not work in the 21st century anymore? turned out the film maker forgot to take note of that.
Gawd, I hated that part. I was like “please don’t scream then zoom out! please don’t scream then zoom out!”
then, he screamed, and the camera zoomed out.

I am not even talking about THIS
b.) you know that typical shot where something is exploding in the background of the protagonist while he calmly, proudly and casually walked away? You can see that in the movie too.
What’s really bad, is that MS Paint could do a better job with the effect.
c.) you know the shot where a triumphant but sad background music is playing and the protagonist is walking towards the sunrise while everything around him is sooo wrecked, showing that in fact the crazy things going around is finish and he can finally rest?
I think that shot happened to this movie twice. Thrice tops. I stopped counting, actually.
That. Was. Way. Beyond. Hilarious.
This movie is baaad, only because I was expecting too much from it. And the cinematography.
Seriously, dudes??? The explosion on the background??? The sunset??? The zoom out????
Interesting trivia: Did you know that Hugh Jackman and Liev Schreiber (Victor) both casted on another movie, which was totally different from this genre? I think they’re also relative there.
The movie? At the end of this post
B.) Star Trek
There’s one reason why Mikay and I watched this flick: Zachary Quinto. And we were not disappointed!

hearts. fades. live long. prosper.
The whole movie was awesome. Sure, you can get confused with the story and the whole time travel and black hole thingies, but thanks to the witty one-liners, awesome effects and some hilarious scenes, the movie was saved!
I tried persuading my friends to watch it, but they said that Star Trek is such a nerdy movie. Well, you’ll be surprised. I don’t know a single thing about Trek and I completely enjoyed the movie.
PS. Try watching it in an awesome cinema house (read: Not SM Sta. Mesa cinema 1) with blasting stereo surround sound and big screen for maximum movie experience.
C.) Angels and Demons
Here it is. Years after The Da Vinci Code was screened, Angels and Demons finally made its way to the cinema house nearest you.
A&D is about the fight between science and faith. Religion, i mean. Science and religion.
A very power stuff – the anti-matter – was stolen from a lab, then held hostage a whole country – the Vatican. The canister which held the anti-matter is feared to drain its battery until midnight. And when that happens, the Vatican (and part of Rome, I heard) will be one whole -REALLY REALLY BIG- crate.
Illuminati, a group shunned by Roman Catholic, was assumed to be non-existent, until four cardinals – who are favorites to replace the recently succumbed pope – where kidnapped. The group claimed the kidnappings. And to add a little spice to the chase game, they claimed that they’re going to kill each of the Cardinals every hour.
And so they did.
Robert Langdon, with the really pretty Vittoria now try to chase down the centuries-old group, try to find the canister and save day.
I like A&D better than TDVC because it’s more exciting.
Sure the movie was entertaining. The opening of the movie was impressive, presenting clearly the situation – the pope died and needed to be replaced. I was a little emotional on that part, I have to admit.
When I read the book, Pope John Paul was still alive and I can only imagine those stuff that Dan Brown was talking about. A year later, I was able to see what Brown has described – including the voting of the new pope – in the television because of the passing away of the Holy Father. It was a really sad opening for a movie
Anyway, I think the movie lacked substance – which what made the book awesome. It forgot the little details (that the priest/scientist killed in the former part of the movie was Vittorias’ father. He was only stressed as her ‘partner’; and that Camerlengo was the Pope’s son. Those small details are quite important, methinks.)
Ok, so I get it. You cannot fit the whole book in the movie. Maybe that’s what makes this movie work and TDVC didn’t. TDVC rely too much on the revelations of how Jesus was married and totally forgot that movies must be intertaning as well. A&D focused on the fun, that’s why this movie is a lot better. If we want revelations, we’d watch Star Talk. Duh.
I was just disappointed with this part where they show the statue of “The Ecstasy of St. Therese”, referred to at the movie as “Fire of St. Therese” or something. It’s the Bernini piece where there’s an angel looking at St. Therese. St. Therese’s eyes are closed and it’s as if she’s having an orgasm.
If you don’t find that interesting, then you are a really boring person.
The statue was not explained in the movie. But I am not complaining (that much). There’s really nothing I can do about it, but those stuff are awesome.
Now let me explain how they ended the movie – NOTHING LIKE THE BOOK’S ENDING.
So, I was in the cinema house, and the movie was going quite well – just like that of the book. Then nearing the movies end, thing didn’t turn out as I have expected.
*spoiler*
- the scene where Ewan McGregor (soooo adorable. I can help but picture his BigFish character) – he played the Camerlengo- ran down to ‘find’ the canister
Aika: wait… they should know already that the Camerlengo IS the bad guy, right? Why is he not acting crazy or something???? this is baaaad….
- the scene were the Camerlengo drove the helicopter to the sky WITH robert
Aika: WHY IS ROBERT LANGDON NOT ON THAT HELICOPTER!?!?!?! WTH!?
- the scene where the Camerlengo parachuted back to the ground – alive.
Aika: HE IS NOT SUPPOSED TO LIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I was already formulating the blog entry on my head, of how disappointing the ending was – then the movie redeemed itself.
*/spoiler*
the next scenes were the ‘revelation’ parts. The director completely changed the ending, as if saying to the audience who read the book “screw you! Hahaha! you didn’t see that one coming, did you!? HAHAHAHAH!”. but the ending’s not something to complain about. It gave me something I was not expecting.
To wrap this, A&D is not the kindov movie worthy to be placed in ‘my favorite movie’ category, but it sure was worth the money for the ticket. The witty script, quasi-impressive chase, and better casting (not to mention, Tom Hank’s Robert Langdon now is more believable than the TDVC version) made it a worthy watch.
D.) Night at the Museum
Night at the Museum 2 is a lot more hilarious than the first one.
two word: Hank Azaria
that guy stole the movie away.

Totally not a skirt
_______
So, which movie did Wolverine and Sabertooth both star and did not try to kill each other with each other’s claws?
Kate and Leopold!
It is a romantic-comedy about Liev being a time traveller, and accidentally bringing Hugh back in the 21st century New York. Liev’s ex lover, Meg Ryan fell in love with Hugh (who wouldn’t?!!??!?!) and Liev was missing in most parts of the film because he was in the hospital because he fell down the elevator shaft… because Hugh invented the elevator and he can’t invent it if he’s in the 21st century, can he? Common time travel newbie mistake. Happens all the time.
I think Liev is the descendant of Hugh in the movie.